Multiple unbound instances

[Miguel Miranda]

well, we have google, youtube, akamai, netflix caches so they say it is
better to have a pool of caches like this providers do, they say the cost
of search an asset in a huge (10GB or so) cache is not better than search
it from the internet itself, i have not seen numbers that prove this but
they say "the exerts at google knows better"

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:53 AM, A. Schulze via Unbound-users <
unbound-users at unbound.net> wrote:

>
> Miguel Miranda via Unbound-users:
>
>
> Hello to all, im installing a load balancer and i want to run multiple
>> unbound instances, im doing this because my it experts says  it is not
>> recommended to have a huge cache (i have 32GB available) it is better to
>> have 2 or 3 GB cache in multiple unbound instances, this is good for high
>> availability too, so if a instances dies the balancer notices it and the
>>  other instances take the load,  what do you think about it ? if this a is
>> a good idea, how to run multiple unbound instances, i am running unbound
>> 1.5.1 Centos 6.7.
>> regards.
>>
>
> running multiple instances is possible - I do so.
> But because of different configurations.
>
> could your "it experts" prove the statement
>  "it is not recommended to have a huge cache"
> somehow?
>
> Andreas
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20160304/a2bfa124/attachment.htm>