[Unbound-users] Old or incorrect information returned?
Haw Loeung
haw.loeung at tpg.com.au
Fri Nov 6 12:48:30 UTC 2009
On Fri, Nov 6th, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> wrote:
> * Haw Loeung:
>
> > The TTL has already lapsed but it is still showing that the domain has
> been
> > delegated to the old hosting providers nextgen.net when it should be
> > cpanelhost.net.au and hyperservers.com.au as shown below:
>
> The domain is still hosted on nextgen.net, with the old zone contents,
> including the old NS RRset.
No, it should be as follows:
======
$ dig +trace supre.com.au
<snip>
com.au. 259200 IN NS udns2.ausregistry.net.au.
com.au. 259200 IN NS udns3.ausregistry.net.au.
com.au. 259200 IN NS udns4.ausregistry.net.au.
;; Received 429 bytes from 2001:dc0:2001:a:4608::59#53(A1.AUDNS.NET.au) in 689 ms
supre.com.au. 14400 IN NS ns1.hyperservers.com.au.
supre.com.au. 14400 IN NS ns2.hyperservers.com.au.
supre.com.au. 14400 IN NS ns1.cpanelhost.net.au.
supre.com.au. 14400 IN NS ns2.cpanelhost.net.au.
;; Received 162 bytes from 211.29.133.32#53(audns.optus.net) in 3 ms
======
> For a successful transition, the new zone contents needs to be served
> from those servers, too.
>
Couldn't agree with you more. But unfortunately, these are not our customers and hence not
domains we host or look after.
--
Haw Loeung
Systems Administrator
TPG Internet
http://www.tpg.com.au
________________________________________________________________
_______
More information about the Unbound-users
mailing list