[Unbound-users] serving stub-zones authoritatively

martin f krafft madduck at madduck.net
Wed Oct 1 20:46:45 UTC 2008

also sprach Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> [2008.10.01.2052 +0200]:
> Argh. This is a "too many buttons for people to push" problem.
> We're still seeing combined auth/resolver servers because of bind,
> and it's bad in general.

What's bad "in general" about running nsd and unbound on the same
machine? I know what's bad about BIND and the like, and it's not the
fact that it provides both services *on the same machine*, but that
*it provides both services*.

martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"die menschen drängen sich zum lichte, nicht um besser zu sehen,
 sondern um besser zu glänzen."
                                                 - friedrich nietzsche
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20081001/f947388a/attachment.bin>

More information about the Unbound-users mailing list