[Unbound-users] serving stub-zones authoritatively

[Paul Wouters]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, martin f krafft wrote:

> What's bad "in general" about running nsd and unbound on the same
> machine? I know what's bad about BIND and the like, and it's not the
> fact that it provides both services *on the same machine*, but that
> *it provides both services*.

Running them both is fine. I was talking against some proposals where 
magic happens between the two daemons for a 'seamless' integration of
modified auth zones.

Paul