[Unbound-users] serving stub-zones authoritatively
paul at xelerance.com
Wed Oct 1 20:52:31 UTC 2008
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> What's bad "in general" about running nsd and unbound on the same
> machine? I know what's bad about BIND and the like, and it's not the
> fact that it provides both services *on the same machine*, but that
> *it provides both services*.
Running them both is fine. I was talking against some proposals where
magic happens between the two daemons for a 'seamless' integration of
modified auth zones.
More information about the Unbound-users