roy at dnss.ec
Thu Nov 14 16:10:34 UTC 2013
On 14 Nov 2013, at 16:00, Roy Arends <roy at dnss.ec> wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2011, at 10:32, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>>> Looks correct to me: by enabling minimal responses, we change the
>>> behavior of NSD slightly. A resolver may expect the optional NS RRsets
>>> and, but not having them in the response should not trouble the
>>> resolver. In my opinion, this biggest risk is not a big risk at all.
>>> I am not aware of any other issues that you should take into considerations.
>> swarm effects.
> Do you have any data to support your swarm effects claim?
Ha, apologies. Accidentally sorted my inbox oldest first, and responded to the first unread message.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the nsd-users