roy at dnss.ec
Thu Nov 14 16:00:22 UTC 2013
On 28 Nov 2011, at 10:32, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>> Looks correct to me: by enabling minimal responses, we change the
>> behavior of NSD slightly. A resolver may expect the optional NS RRsets
>> and, but not having them in the response should not trouble the
>> resolver. In my opinion, this biggest risk is not a big risk at all.
>> I am not aware of any other issues that you should take into considerations.
> swarm effects.
Do you have any data to support your swarm effects claim?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the nsd-users