Unbound 1.22.0rc1 pre-release

Robert Edmonds edmonds at debian.org
Thu Oct 10 19:14:15 UTC 2024


Hi, Wouter:

The harden-unverified-glue patch sounds interesting so I started reading
the code. It looks like this was added in commit 1e0cf1e86b.

I see where an extra 'flags' parameter was added to
the cache_fill_missing() function in order to pass the
PACKED_RRSET_UNVERIFIED_GLUE flag through to the rrset_cache_lookup()
function.

However, I only see the flags being passed through for the
LDNS_RR_TYPE_A case here [0]:

    akey = rrset_cache_lookup(env->rrset_cache, ns->name, 
        ns->namelen, LDNS_RR_TYPE_A, qclass, flags, now, 0);
		                                     ^^^^^^

And not for the LDNS_RR_TYPE_AAAA case here [1]:

    akey = rrset_cache_lookup(env->rrset_cache, ns->name, 
        ns->namelen, LDNS_RR_TYPE_AAAA, qclass, 0, now, 0);
		                                        ^^

Is this a bug or is there some reason that A vs. AAAA records are
treated differently?

Also, do I understand correctly that the 'flags' parameter is part
of the hash key, so that the RRsets stored with 'flags' set to
PACKED_RRSET_UNVERIFIED_GLUE can never be retrieved unless that exact
'flags' value is specified by a subsequent lookup?

Thanks!

[0] https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/blame/8b7782e8fc11148abb8abe115f2a12b7974d9619/services/cache/dns.c#L379-L380

[1] https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/blame/8b7782e8fc11148abb8abe115f2a12b7974d9619/services/cache/dns.c#L400-L401

Wouter Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> The unverified glue is about glue that is outside of the strict or narrow
> glue definition of in zone glue, not about glue that is outside of bailiwick
> or outside of parent zone, of course, that is already scrubbed. Something
> about policies at registrars and ownership of domains. So, not the case you
> cite; that would already be scrubbed by code in earlier releases.
> 
> There are defaults for those options, that are values suggested by the
> researchers. I guess it is possible to toggle these kinds options if the
> server is placed in a situation where they do not apply.
> 
> The naming of the redis options could be changed, if that is nicer for the
> users of it. Aliases make for neat backwards compatibility, that is nice.
> 
> Best regards, Wouter
> 
> On 10/10/2024 15:55, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024, Wouter Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote:
> > 
> > > This release has an option to harden against unverified glue, it
> > > is enabled with `harden-unverified-glue: yes`. It was contributed
> > > by Karthik Umashankar from Microsoft. This protects Unbound against
> > > bad glue, that is out of zone, by performing a lookup for it.
> > 
> > I am quite surprised that this wasn't dropped before this release?
> > Do you mean to say unverified (no DNSSEC signed) glue records that
> > were out of zone / bailiwick were just added to the cache before?
> > If so, that would be CVE worthy. And shouldn't need an option to
> > enable/disable.
> > 
> > > Because it uses the original information as a last resort if nothing
> > > works, it should not give lookup failures, and add protection.
> > 
> > So this is different from an A lookup for nohats.ca. that contains
> > glue for cnn.com ? Those are unused and not placed in the cache?
> > 
> > > There are options to configure the scrubbing for NS records and
> > > the CNAME scrubbing and the max global quota lookup limit from
> > > previous security fix releases. They can be configured with the
> > > options `iter-scrub-ns`, `iter-scrub-cname` and `max-global-quota`.
> > 
> > I am not sure I understand enough to give these sane values?
> > 
> > > For redis use, with cachedb, it is possible to specify the
> > > timeout for the initial connection separately from the timeout
> > > for commands. With the options `redis-command-timeout: 20` and
> > > `redis-connect-timeout: 200` they can be set separately, for
> > > a longer connect attempt, but a short command timeout to keep
> > > resolution faster.
> > 
> > Maybe make valkey-* aliases and slowly phase out the redis- options?
> > 
> > Paul

-- 
Robert Edmonds
edmonds at debian.org


More information about the Unbound-users mailing list