[SUSPECT EMAIL: No Reputation] Re: bind socket error

[Modster, Anthony]

Hello

I found the problem, fixed by flushing the unbound.conf outgoing-interface Section before each session.

Thanks


Teledyne Confidential; Commercially Sensitive Business Data

-----Original Message-----
From: Unbound <unbound at tacomawireless.net> 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 3:36 PM
To: contact at marc05.net
Cc: Modster, Anthony <Anthony.Modster at Teledyne.com>; unbound-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl
Subject: [SUSPECT EMAIL: No Reputation] Re: bind socket error

---External Email---
CAUTION: This email originated from a new mail server that has not been online long enough to receive a reputation rating. Many phishing attempts originate from servers fitting this profile. Unless you were expecting this email and are confident that it is legitimate, please delete it immediately.

On 2021-06-16 12:30, Marcos Mendoza via Unbound-users wrote:
> Though I'm not entirely certain, I believe that means Unbound could 
> not use that IP address as its outgoing-interface. Typically that's 
> due to the interface being unbelievable for some reason.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 1:03 PM Modster, Anthony via Unbound-users < 
> unbound-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hello
>> 
>> What causes the error to bind socket ?
>> 
>> We have seen these errors when configured for “unbound resolver” or 
>> “unbound forwarding” modes.
>> 
>> They seem to not cause a problem, the resolver eventually resolves 
>> the request.
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [err] [12764:0]
>> error: can\'t bind socket: Cannot assign requested address for
>> 192.168.0.131 port 59253 (len 16)
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: error sending query to auth server ip4 8.8.8.8 port 53 (len 16)
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: processQueryTargets: 
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1GmzYsm8Hi-FeCmHyptgvicuRU171MBDLXig7V_D8
>> lu36eWakat97L3LGOgxNjE46PnHsTlO9DCvgMrke5lJGWuZD4Ktk2ZTL-Hol2z8u2ueL0
>> qfAzbQapUmyN8LKrfeKAx3sxDCdluoXhgDEDv2Y1zaVc83Lo_Lkhu2Wr-pLDYtgaXLpC_
>> AzXgYjgpSsS59Ls2AdQ6t1nnorUo2_i4-7kjll0_UmPteZJl32oLUCHVzWRbnxwGYFu-d
>> nZrKsQDf1cQkJBZairyS-DdU_ercNuw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carillon.ca A IN
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:35+00:00 wglng-17 wireless [notice]
>> LinkManagerHandler() base station connection BSC1 r0=up r1=dn r2=dn 
>> r3=dn eth=dn  BSC2 r0=dn r1=dn r2=dn r3=dn eth=dn
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: DelegationPoint<.>: 0 names (0 missing), 1 addrs (1 result, 0 
>> avail) parentNS
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: sending query: 
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1GmzYsm8Hi-FeCmHyptgvicuRU171MBDLXig7V_D8
>> lu36eWakat97L3LGOgxNjE46PnHsTlO9DCvgMrke5lJGWuZD4Ktk2ZTL-Hol2z8u2ueL0
>> qfAzbQapUmyN8LKrfeKAx3sxDCdluoXhgDEDv2Y1zaVc83Lo_Lkhu2Wr-pLDYtgaXLpC_
>> AzXgYjgpSsS59Ls2AdQ6t1nnorUo2_i4-7kjll0_UmPteZJl32oLUCHVzWRbnxwGYFu-d
>> nZrKsQDf1cQkJBZairyS-DdU_ercNuw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carillon.ca A IN
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [err] [12764:0]
>> error: can\'t bind socket: Cannot assign requested address for 
>> 10.130.230.8 port 19652 (len 16)
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: error sending query to auth server ip4 8.8.8.8 port 53 (len 16)
>> 
>> ·         2021 Jun 16 17:17:34+00:00 wglng-17 unbound [info] [12764:0]
>> info: processQueryTargets: 
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1GmzYsm8Hi-FeCmHyptgvicuRU171MBDLXig7V_D8
>> lu36eWakat97L3LGOgxNjE46PnHsTlO9DCvgMrke5lJGWuZD4Ktk2ZTL-Hol2z8u2ueL0
>> qfAzbQapUmyN8LKrfeKAx3sxDCdluoXhgDEDv2Y1zaVc83Lo_Lkhu2Wr-pLDYtgaXLpC_
>> AzXgYjgpSsS59Ls2AdQ6t1nnorUo2_i4-7kjll0_UmPteZJl32oLUCHVzWRbnxwGYFu-d
>> nZrKsQDf1cQkJBZairyS-DdU_ercNuw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carillon.ca A IN
>> 
>> Thanks
This looks very much like port contention. IOW something else is using the port, or ports that you've assigned to unbound..Sorry if someone else has already informed you of this. As I'm trying to get caught up on my mail. :-)

>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Teledyne Confidential; Commercially Sensitive Business Data
>>