DNS versus NAT ?

[Ronald F. Guilmette]

In message <20190614024738.C5395201547D1D at ary.qy>, 
John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:

>In article <alpine.DEB.2.20.1906130953120.16652 at grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> you write:
>>Ronald F. Guilmette via Unbound-users <unbound-users at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>>> And if that is the case, then will my SOHO router catch fire if and when
>>> I elect to send out through it a set of 65536 or more separate DNS queries,
>>> all in rapid succession? ...
>>
>
>>IP addresses) or get a colo box for high volume DNS query traffic.
>
>This sounds like a job for a $5/mo linux VPS at any of a zillion
>hosting companies.  It gets its own static public IP address, no
>NAT nonsense needed.

I am in agreement.  I had been doing my DNS research from a static IP
associated with an end luser broadband line, but I am re-jiggering
my entire network now and plan to get rid of -that- static IP.  And
that's what prompted my question(s).  Apparently, once I make this
change, I won't be able to just carry along as I had been doing before.
Instead, as it now seems, I'll have to move my DNS research to some
cloudish sort of place.