TLS certificate question about Unbound 1.9.2

[Yuri]

Ah. You risky :) Take stable. Im running stable 1.9.1 on 3 production
servers exclusively with DoT, with openssl 1.0.2o and have no issues.

Also, of course, re-write unbound.conf. From 1.6.0 to 1.9.x eternity has
passed. :)
Despite backward compatibility, the versions are still too different.
In any case, I advise you to get a stable latest released version 1.9.1.

PS. It is bad idea use unstable (when working in progress) from github
and trying to use. This is very risky and usually for experienced
programmers, who know what they are doing.

03.04.2019 00:28, rollingonchrome via Unbound-users пишет:
> We cloned from GitHub. It showed 1.9.1 as the latest but when it
> compiled it said 1.9.2.
>
> https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound 
>
-- 
"C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."

*****************************
* C++20 : Bug to the future *
*****************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20190403/76dc923a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20190403/76dc923a/attachment.bin>