unbound binaries execution issue

SIMON BABY simonkbaby at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 23:04:29 UTC 2018


Hello Paul,

Do we have any other public DNS validating servers other that 8.8.8.8 which
support DNSSEC? I tried with 8.8.8.8 and the results are always bogus. it
looks like 8.8.8.8 is stripping off all the
DNSSEC related flags when it send back the reply to my client.

Rgds
Simon

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:31 PM, SIMON BABY <simonkbaby at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Paul,
>
> Can i know if I can specify the particular  interface as a default gw for
> sending query in the code
> without explicitly configuring that  interface as a gw.  I checked in my
> system and it fails.  In my system I do not have any default gw configured.
> So the packets generated within my system are not going outside until
> I configure a default gw.
>
> Rgds
> simon
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, SIMON BABY via Unbound-users wrote:
>>
>>  I get the below error while trying to launch unbound-host  or
>>> unbound-anchor or any unbound executable in my build env. Can someone help
>>> to solve this issue?
>>>
>>> sbaby at ubuntu:~/workspace/wqar/tmp/work/mips-mv-linux/libunbo
>>> und-1.6.8-r0/libunbound/unbound-1.6.8$ ./unbound-host
>>>
>>
>> is "sbaby" a mips machines too? It looks like you are perhaps
>> cross-compiling, so in that case the binary cannot be tested
>> on the build host.
>>
>> Or maybe your "mips-mv-linux" is a cross compile using a different
>> set of libraries (like a different c library) ?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20180309/eaf7c243/attachment.htm>


More information about the Unbound-users mailing list