[Unbound-users] Unbound doesn't cache ANY query result from some DNSSEC-signed zone

Tue Jul 2 18:16:15 UTC 2013

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Peter Koch <pk at denic.de> wrote:
> I am not convinced that implementing ANY as 'all', encouraging
> false expectations, is really the right thing to do.
> Additionally, in the context of recent events - even if unbound
> would only rarely be run as open recursive - it 'helps' authoritative
> servers to see more queries.

I apologize if I am asking something that might be obvious to others I
am not well versed in DNS. Why is it helpful for authortative servers
to see more queries?