[Unbound-users] Unbound release 1.4.12

[Robert Edmonds]

Paul Wouters wrote:
> see many discussions here in the last. The debian and fedora maintainers
> both asks for it to be decoupled, as the tar ball copy inside unbound is
> confusing and can sometimes accidentally get linked by unbound if the
> ldns dev/devel package is not installed. Staticly linked libraries on
> systems are not good. If you think you have ldns 1.6.10 but unbound had
> been statically linked to 1.6.9, you might have a security issue.....

actually i don't think i've requested ldns to be unbundled from unbound
(i think that was ondrej, who is the ldns package maintainer), but i'm
happy to see the unbound source tarball a bit smaller and for it to be
impossible for bundled ldns to be used.

-- 
Robert Edmonds
edmonds at debian.org