[Unbound-users] Unbound and Bind Views
Bruce.Hayward at mtsallstream.com
Mon Oct 25 13:37:06 UTC 2010
Thanks for the direction, but how does Unbound know to have IPs in a range use a specific zone?
Bruce Hayward, MTS Allstream Inc., (p) 204-958-1983 (e) bruce.hayward at mtsallstream.com
From: Ondřej Surý [mailto:ondrej at sury.org]
Sent: October 25, 2010 8:33 AM
To: Hayward, Bruce
Cc: unbound-users at unbound.net
Subject: Re: [Unbound-users] Unbound and Bind Views
it should be fairly easy to accomplish both option using DNAT on linux
(or using other translation mechanisms either on the router or on the
f.e. on linux you can use:
- 10.10.10.1 is the normal address
- 10.10.10.2 is extra address you use to serve internal clients (can
be localhost if NATed on the box)
- 192.168.1.1/32 is the specific CIDR
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.1.1/32 -d 10.10.10.1 -j DNAT
If you do the NAT on the router before, it has the added benefit of
splitting the load (so you can provide less loaded service to your
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:18, Hayward, Bruce
<Bruce.Hayward at mtsallstream.com> wrote:
> On specific resolvers we use bind views to direct those who come from an IP in a specific CIDR to use a specific zone. We have two cases of these views.
> We also use views to isolate those that should only use internal zones versus those that should not use internal zones (external customers)
> Those that do not come from an IP in a specific CIDR use a global zone.
> "Views" were introduced in Bind 9.
> Bruce Hayward, MTS Allstream Inc., (p) 204-958-1983 (e) bruce.hayward at mtsallstream.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: unbound-users-bounces at NLnetLabs.nl [mailto:unbound-users-bounces at NLnetLabs.nl] On Behalf Of Ondrej Surý
> Sent: October 21, 2010 9:52 AM
> To: unbound-users at unbound.net
> Subject: Re: [Unbound-users] Unbound and Bind Views
> Hey Bruce,
> I think that it's pretty well documented in the mail you sent a
> link... you setup two unbound instances and mangle the traffic from
> set of ip addresses using standard firewall/nat features your
> operating system has.
> Anyway maybe if you can explain what you are trying to accomplish then
> we can propose alternative without views.
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 15:32, Hayward, Bruce
> <Bruce.Hayward at mtsallstream.com> wrote:
>> One area of Bind that we use is views to direct traffic.
>> Before we can switch to Unbound, we would need a means of emulating
>> In researching this (on Google) I came across a thread discussing this:
>> Has anyone documented steps to accomplish this?
>> Bruce Hayward, MTS Allstream Inc., (p) 204-958-1983 (e)
>> bruce.hayward at mtsallstream.com
>> Is it really necessary to print this email?
>> MTS ALLSTREAM INC. CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This email message is confidential and intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or if this message has been sent to you in error, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original message. If there is an agreement attached with this message, such agreement will not be binding until it is signed by all parties named therein.
>> Unbound-users mailing list
>> Unbound-users at unbound.net
> Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
> Unbound-users mailing list
> Unbound-users at unbound.net
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
More information about the Unbound-users