[Unbound-users] Semantics of 'forward'
tim at matter2media.com
Sat Jul 24 09:25:56 UTC 2010
Is there a way of making U use DNS rather than EDNS to get around this
situation? If it uses EDNS for forward zones, that would explain why
they didn't solve my problem.
On 24/07/2010 09:31, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Tim Kindberg:
>> DNS clients on U receive correct results from D as expected.
>> But when C requests a resolution result via U, D does not reply.
>> In other words, D has a setting that drops recursive requests not
>> originating with the requestor.
> The DNS protocol currently does not support that because it does not
> distinguish forwarded from original requests (but there is a draft
> which would change this).
> So D probably just refuses to respond to EDNS requests which U happens
> to send. This would also happen to C if they sent EDNS requests, too.
Matter 2 Media Ltd
e: tim at matter2media.com
m: +44 (0)7954 582814
t: +44 (0)117 9095221
More information about the Unbound-users