[Unbound-users] DNS-ALG/DNS64 question
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Oct 5 19:48:17 UTC 2009
* Simon Perreault:
> On Sunday 04 October 2009 14:45:51 Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I guess all systems on which Unbound runs are dual-stack, so this type
>> of translation appears to be unnecessary (at the DNS level).
> This has nothing to do with the need for DNS64. See
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-dns64-00 for details.
Apparently, I was quite confused yesterday. I still think that DNS64
is only needed if you have IPv6-only clients without *any* IPv4 stack
whatsoever. But such clients could send queries to an Unbound cache,
so adding this to Unbound wouldn't be as pointless as I thought.
More information about the Unbound-users