[Unbound-users] serving stub-zones authoritatively

[martin f krafft]

also sprach W.C.A. Wijngaards <wouter at NLnetLabs.nl> [2008.10.01.1652 +0200]:
> No, it does not look like solid theory.  I understand it could be
> useful in practice.  You see, the stub may have returned CNAMEs or
> delegations to other servers.  Unbound would do the additional
> lookups.  Results stored in the cache with a TTL.  Setting AA flag
> for that is not correct.

If any part of the answer is answered from cache or a forward- or
root-server, clear the bit, obviously. But if everything comes from
a stub-zone, there's no reason not to set AA, and there's even no
real reason to cache, is there? I would appreciate not having to
wait for min-TTL to expire to see changes made to my local zone...

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"if you can dream it, you can do it"
                                                        -- walt disney
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20081001/6b0fd13c/attachment.bin>