From martin at nlnetlabs.nl Wed Jan 19 10:27:27 2022 From: martin at nlnetlabs.nl (Martin Hoffmann) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:27:27 +0100 Subject: [RPKI] =?utf-8?q?RTRTR_0=2E2=2E0_=E2=80=98Arts_and_Crafts_and_Ta?= =?utf-8?q?ctical_Gear=E2=80=99_released?= Message-ID: <20220119112727.3986cab0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> Dear mailing list, we are happy to announce the latest release of RTRTR, version 0.2.0 ?Arts and Crafts and Tactical Gear.? RTRTR is a tool to collect RPKI data from one or more sources in multiple formats and dispatch it onwards. It provides the means to implement multiple distribution architectures for RPKI such as centralised RPKI validators that dispatch data to local caching RTR servers. This version introduces a new "slurm" unit that can be used to modify the RPKI data set using local exception files as defined in RFC 8416. In addition, RTRTR can now speak RTR-over-TLS both as a client through the new "rtr-tls" unit as well as a server through the target with the same type name. As always, there have been a number of smaller changes and improvements. Most important of these is perhaps that RTRTR?s "json" unit now understands the modified JSON format produced by newer versions of rpki-client. The complete list of changes available in the release notes at https://github.com/NLnetLabs/rtrtr/releases/tag/v0.2.0 More information about RTRTR including installation instructions can be found in the new RTRTR Manual at https://rtrtr.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/ On behalf of the NLnet Labs RPKI Team, Martin From fischerdouglas at gmail.com Wed Jan 19 10:44:59 2022 From: fischerdouglas at gmail.com (Douglas Fischer) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:44:59 -0300 Subject: [RPKI] =?utf-8?q?RTRTR_0=2E2=2E0_=E2=80=98Arts_and_Crafts_and_Ta?= =?utf-8?q?ctical_Gear=E2=80=99_released?= In-Reply-To: <20220119112727.3986cab0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> References: <20220119112727.3986cab0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: Hello! I just checked https://rtrtr.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/manual-page.html#slurm-unit I was hoping for a practical example of that use... Is it on roadmap adding some examples? Would it be possible to use some regular expressions in true VRPs and creating somo "only local significative" VRPs? An example of that would be saying that any /32 contained on any /8-24 valid VRP could also be considered Valid... Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 ?s 07:27, Martin Hoffmann via RPKI < rpki at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> escreveu: > Dear mailing list, > > we are happy to announce the latest release of RTRTR, version 0.2.0 > ?Arts and Crafts and Tactical Gear.? > > RTRTR is a tool to collect RPKI data from one or more sources in > multiple formats and dispatch it onwards. It provides the means to > implement multiple distribution architectures for RPKI such as > centralised RPKI validators that dispatch data to local caching RTR > servers. > > This version introduces a new "slurm" unit that can be used to > modify the RPKI data set using local exception files as defined in > RFC 8416. > > In addition, RTRTR can now speak RTR-over-TLS both as a client through > the new "rtr-tls" unit as well as a server through the target with > the same type name. > > As always, there have been a number of smaller changes and improvements. > Most important of these is perhaps that RTRTR?s "json" unit now > understands the modified JSON format produced by newer versions of > rpki-client. > > The complete list of changes available in the release notes at > > https://github.com/NLnetLabs/rtrtr/releases/tag/v0.2.0 > > More information about RTRTR including installation instructions can be > found in the new RTRTR Manual at > > https://rtrtr.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/ > > > On behalf of the NLnet Labs RPKI Team, > Martin > -- > RPKI mailing list > RPKI at lists.nlnetlabs.nl > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/rpki > -- Douglas Fernando Fischer Eng? de Controle e Automa??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at nlnetlabs.nl Wed Jan 19 10:54:36 2022 From: martin at nlnetlabs.nl (Martin Hoffmann) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:54:36 +0100 Subject: [RPKI] =?utf-8?q?RTRTR_0=2E2=2E0_=E2=80=98Arts_and_Crafts_and_Ta?= =?utf-8?q?ctical_Gear=E2=80=99_released?= In-Reply-To: References: <20220119112727.3986cab0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <20220119115436.5c4d3df6@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> Hi! Douglas Fischer wrote: > > I just checked > https://rtrtr.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/manual-page.html#slurm-unit > I was hoping for a practical example of that use... > > Is it on roadmap adding some examples? That certainly can be done. > Would it be possible to use some regular expressions in true VRPs and > creating somo "only local significative" VRPs? The "slurm" unit is using RFC 8416 files only, i.e., you can filter out VRPs based on specific prefixes, ASNs, or both; or add specific VRPs. > An example of that would be saying that any /32 contained on any /8-24 > valid VRP could also be considered Valid... That would imply making a separate VRP for each and every one of these /32s. I don?t think that?s what you want? But if you do, you can probably write a script that generates a SLURM file that includes all those VRPs. Cheers, Martin From alex at nlnetlabs.nl Thu Jan 27 16:18:40 2022 From: alex at nlnetlabs.nl (Alex Band) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:18:40 +0100 Subject: [RPKI] =?utf-8?q?RTRTR_0=2E2=2E0_=E2=80=98Arts_and_Crafts_and_Ta?= =?utf-8?q?ctical_Gear=E2=80=99_released?= In-Reply-To: <20220119115436.5c4d3df6@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> References: <20220119112727.3986cab0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> <20220119115436.5c4d3df6@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <38304AA2-C95F-4690-87FB-58079C45C266@nlnetlabs.nl> Hi Douglas, Sorry, I missed this conversation but I?d like to add there is an example SLURM file available here: https://github.com/NLnetLabs/rpki-rs/blob/main/test-data/slurm/full.json I?ll make sure to add it to the documentation. Cheers, Alex > On 19 Jan 2022, at 11:54, Martin Hoffmann via RPKI wrote: > > Hi! > > Douglas Fischer wrote: >> >> I just checked >> https://rtrtr.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/manual-page.html#slurm-unit >> I was hoping for a practical example of that use... >> >> Is it on roadmap adding some examples? > > That certainly can be done. > >> Would it be possible to use some regular expressions in true VRPs and >> creating somo "only local significative" VRPs? > > The "slurm" unit is using RFC 8416 files only, i.e., you can filter out > VRPs based on specific prefixes, ASNs, or both; or add specific VRPs. > >> An example of that would be saying that any /32 contained on any /8-24 >> valid VRP could also be considered Valid... > > That would imply making a separate VRP for each and every one of these > /32s. I don?t think that?s what you want? But if you do, you can > probably write a script that generates a SLURM file that includes all > those VRPs. > > Cheers, > Martin > -- > RPKI mailing list > RPKI at lists.nlnetlabs.nl > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/rpki