[nsd-users] REFUSED vs SERVFAIL
pk at DENIC.DE
Sun Jan 19 15:29:10 UTC 2014
> To me, BIND and Knot's responses seem more logical. They distinguish
> between the cases where a zone has simply not been configured, versus
> the case where the zone has gone bad for some reason. With NSD, one
I agree and I'd also like to see REFUSED for queries into deliberately not
served space, at least as a compile time option, or as a config parameter.
> can't tell. Is there a reason NSD returns SERVFAIL for unconfigured zones?
See appendix B.1 of doc/REQUIREMENTS.
More information about the nsd-users