[nsd-users] +rrcomments

[Klaus Darilion]

Not related to NSD at all, but just try it and you see the difference:

$ dig com dnskey
com.                    18437   IN      DNSKEY  256 3 8 
AQP4EYpFFaPyZO6sdDcbU9TLub57XXz6zYVh3cC61DLXIUg89GE1i0gl 
03bXsqVZ49p/fnEQNf63yY1JTbJ9rzCg1YiSUy72V9cybseC4l2Ct/aJ 
mvPwW7ULFdcNFfh9+RZvSO5CU2CCaJqD7j6Rm7igomG+TtQGQj1c0uNl h8jzuw==


$ dig com dnskey +rrcomments
com.                    18433   IN      DNSKEY  256 3 8 
AQP4EYpFFaPyZO6sdDcbU9TLub57XXz6zYVh3cC61DLXIUg89GE1i0gl 
03bXsqVZ49p/fnEQNf63yY1JTbJ9rzCg1YiSUy72V9cybseC4l2Ct/aJ 
mvPwW7ULFdcNFfh9+RZvSO5CU2CCaJqD7j6Rm7igomG+TtQGQj1c0uNl h8jzuw==  ; 
ZSK; alg = RSASHA256; key id = 22625


You see, that dig adds a comment into the RR which describes the RR 
(especially useful for DNSEC related keys).

regards
Klaus


On 09.12.2013 10:57, Andreas Schulze wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just read about dig 9.9.x and a +rrcomments extension. G. find not
> more then "used to queries for dnskey"
>
> I worry about my comments are now disclosed by that option and like to
> know something more about it.
> Could somebody switch the light on?
>
> Thanks
> Andreas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsd-users mailing list
> nsd-users at NLnetLabs.nl
> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users