[nsd-users] IXFR regression in nsd 3.2.9?

[Matthijs Mekking]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/05/2012 03:58 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:48:13PM +0100, W.C.A. Wijngaards
> <wouter at NLnetLabs.nl> wrote a message of 99 lines which said:
> 
>> Bugfix #423: Fix slow zone transfer processing due to 'Fix
>> is_existing flag for ENT' bugfix.
> 
> This description does not really match the symptoms... Why does
> 3.2.9 work for the other name server? Why even very small zones
> like zonecheck.fr has a problem?

I am not sure, but from your previous mail I thought that the name
server with issues has a lot more zones and a lot bigger zones. I
assume that this is the cause why the one name server works and the
other not.

Although the small zone has been saved to disk, it could be that it is
handled after the (huge, endless during) zone transfer and therefor
the new zonecheck.fr zone is not yet being served (and you don't yet
see the log message indicating the update).

So I believe that all the behavior with 3.2.9 you described is related
to bug #423.

Best regards,
  Matthijs

> 
> We'll test with 3.2.10 to see. 
> _______________________________________________ nsd-users mailing
> list nsd-users at NLnetLabs.nl 
> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPVNjPAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5SIgH/1W+ddro+jZ1BZmh9ZjQ36Lj
ZRNawUFyNJWmo6INaEcLu4DLkNZS9F7m8kxanG8iTjBaPMaqHRKYjaD17sVjUr4c
HAotEoZaXobVViHJVnqn+yulej3lQ+vv4O6Iu22/RsTlkbKBkGhMyjYYgqtRLeiS
Ai27PVximVJ7z2oiNBblluQpzXEc9uPGbRz+nnW3pjmfVSRwjwNIglRG7DV3IlBJ
hhbjc1RM5eonxbk1MoMpJFvVj2YSoCkijEx4btDh0N5ggnyacYARF28KV5FYH4Vb
NlhWrKJTJHoUn02zb+JfrIA75UmUIx14NWgyl0boYJzUQodwccAV28pz67FDjnE=
=eBEI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----