which is the vaild a format?
wouter at NLnetLabs.nl
Mon Dec 11 10:47:07 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Martin-Legene wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:46:41AM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> this is not accepted by bind, but accepted by nsd and if use a bind as a
>> slave for this zone where nsd is the master (which accept this zone)
>> then got the error which i send originally. so the question it's a bind
>> bug or nsd?
> I'd say BIND is correct in refusing to load an invalid zone.
> Per RFC you're not allowed to have CNAME together with SOA, NS, MX etc.
> I think nsd MUST refuse to load it too.
You are correct. NSD now follows Bind and prints an error 'CNAME and
other data at the same name' for the example used here. The error is
printed when you compile a zone with zonec.
The error is not printed when RRSIG, NSEC types are next to a CNAME.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the nsd-users