From willem at nlnetlabs.nl  Mon Mar 18 14:28:57 2013
From: willem at nlnetlabs.nl (Willem Toorop)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:28:57 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] Problem using ldns-dane (version 1.6.16)
In-Reply-To: <c0af01ce0b75$6ea85d90$4bf918b0$@streamservice.nl>
References: <c05d01ce0b0b$e7e1e510$b7a5af30$@streamservice.nl>
 <511E0AA2.20705@nlnetlabs.nl>
 <c0af01ce0b75$6ea85d90$4bf918b0$@streamservice.nl>
Message-ID: <514724A9.9050601@nlnetlabs.nl>

Op 15-02-13 13:10, Mark Scholten schreef:
> Thank you for pointing to this option, the method I used was mentioned in
> the README file.

I have adapted README with the preferred way of configuring.
Thanks again,

-- Willem



From willem at nlnetlabs.nl  Mon Mar 18 14:35:45 2013
From: willem at nlnetlabs.nl (Willem Toorop)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:35:45 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] Missing or incorrect prototypes
In-Reply-To: <8638wvc3bh.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References: <86liapp7j9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86a9r3c3jx.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <8638wvc3bh.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Message-ID: <51472641.20906@nlnetlabs.nl>

Thank you DES,

Your patches are committed to trunk (Though unstaticized
ldns_dname_compare_v, because it is used in dnssec_sign too ;). I have
removed the unused functions (i.s.o. #if 0).
Cheers,

-- Willem

Op 16-02-13 23:16, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav schreef:
> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des at des.no> writes:
>> Hmm, some of these aren't even used *inside* their translation unit, so
>> this patch may cause warnings about unused functions.
> 
> The attached patch (relative to the previous patch) #ifs them out.
> 
> DES
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ldns-users mailing list
> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl
> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users
>