From patrik at frobbit.se  Mon Feb  7 03:13:06 2011
From: patrik at frobbit.se (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 04:13:06 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] ldnspy and python 3.0
Message-ID: <22D45A06-ACE0-487D-8383-A74B2A39EF67@frobbit.se>

Has anyone worked on getting ldnspy working with python 3.0?

There are some issues with print statements and how exceptions are handled that should be changed...

   Patrik




From ondrej at sury.org  Mon Feb  7 08:34:52 2011
From: ondrej at sury.org (=?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?=)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:34:52 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] ldnspy and python 3.0
In-Reply-To: <22D45A06-ACE0-487D-8383-A74B2A39EF67@frobbit.se>
References: <22D45A06-ACE0-487D-8383-A74B2A39EF67@frobbit.se>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinSzrUDQgrLuQ7-K1Uy_KoqK0waZT1PgWq3CDPe@mail.gmail.com>

Patrik,

since I have one of the authors of ldns python binding on my team,
we'll fix that in some not-so-far future? How fast do you need the
fix?

Ondrej

2011/2/7 Patrik F?ltstr?m <patrik at frobbit.se>:
> Has anyone worked on getting ldnspy working with python 3.0?
>
> There are some issues with print statements and how exceptions are handled that should be changed...
>
> ? Patrik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldns-users mailing list
> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl
> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users
>



-- 
?Ond?ej Sur? <ondrej at sury.org>



From patrik at frobbit.se  Mon Feb  7 10:33:19 2011
From: patrik at frobbit.se (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:33:19 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] ldnspy and python 3.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinSzrUDQgrLuQ7-K1Uy_KoqK0waZT1PgWq3CDPe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <22D45A06-ACE0-487D-8383-A74B2A39EF67@frobbit.se>
	<AANLkTinSzrUDQgrLuQ7-K1Uy_KoqK0waZT1PgWq3CDPe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <31706D88-B982-454C-9D2F-804D6F9B4C84@frobbit.se>

Well, I am writing some preliminary code now, in Python <3.0, which is fine for preliminary development.

But, I hope later this spring, or in the summer (on the northern hemisphere) hopefully start the real development that I would like to do in Python 3.x. If nothing else due to the support of Unicode.

No hurry though, as the code I write should be able to work in both 2.x and 3.x so if I start coding, moving *my* code should work pretty well.

Sep 2011 I think I would like to see Python 3.0 support though...if I can choose (and you asked ;-) ).

   Patrik

On 7 feb 2011, at 09.34, Ond?ej Sur? wrote:

> Patrik,
> 
> since I have one of the authors of ldns python binding on my team,
> we'll fix that in some not-so-far future? How fast do you need the
> fix?
> 
> Ondrej
> 
> 2011/2/7 Patrik F?ltstr?m <patrik at frobbit.se>:
>> Has anyone worked on getting ldnspy working with python 3.0?
>> 
>> There are some issues with print statements and how exceptions are handled that should be changed...
>> 
>>   Patrik
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ldns-users mailing list
>> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl
>> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ?Ond?ej Sur? <ondrej at sury.org>
> 




From slava at tangramltd.com  Fri Feb 18 09:21:42 2011
From: slava at tangramltd.com (Slava Dubrovskiy)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:21:42 +0200
Subject: [ldns-users] Usage libidn for national domains
Message-ID: <4D5E3A26.6090002@tangramltd.com>

Hi.
Now domains in the national coding are popular enough.
For example in cyrillic. In dig it is for this purpose used libidn.
Whether probably to make in drill such support?

-- 
WBR,
Dubrovskiy Vyacheslav


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5525 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/ldns-users/attachments/20110218/0f566782/attachment.bin>

From bedrich.kosata at nic.cz  Fri Feb 25 08:36:58 2011
From: bedrich.kosata at nic.cz (Bedrich Kosata)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:58 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] minor addition to the python wrapper
Message-ID: <4D676A2A.9070708@nic.cz>

Hello,

I found out that the function "ldns_fetch_valid_domain_keys" could not 
be called from python, because the 4th argument is ldns_status* which it 
is not possible to pass from python.
I added an additional wrapper around this fuction, so that it requires 
only the first three arguments and both the status and the actual result 
are returned as a tuple.
I send a diff against the current SVN branch in the attachment.

Cheers

Beda

-- 
Bedrich Kosata
CZ.NIC Labs <http://labs.nic.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ldns.i.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/ldns-users/attachments/20110225/1e96b9dd/attachment.bin>

From wouter at NLnetLabs.nl  Fri Feb 25 09:48:26 2011
From: wouter at NLnetLabs.nl (W.C.A. Wijngaards)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:48:26 +0100
Subject: [ldns-users] minor addition to the python wrapper
In-Reply-To: <4D676A2A.9070708@nic.cz>
References: <4D676A2A.9070708@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <4D677AEA.3010303@nlnetlabs.nl>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Bedrich,

On 02/25/2011 09:36 AM, Bedrich Kosata wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I found out that the function "ldns_fetch_valid_domain_keys" could not
> be called from python, because the 4th argument is ldns_status* which it
> is not possible to pass from python.
> I added an additional wrapper around this fuction, so that it requires
> only the first three arguments and both the status and the actual result
> are returned as a tuple.
> I send a diff against the current SVN branch in the attachment.

Thank you, patch applied to the svn trunk of ldns.

Best regards,
   Wouter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1neuoACgkQkDLqNwOhpPiUfwCfUGOtWEaC4mtwekQby/nJXTyI
8VAAnA4AJOymUfARZWVq5G55qVcFtznr
=Rcg5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----