From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Thu Jul 1 14:45:24 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:45:24 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work Message-ID: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> Hi, I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). Here is an input of ldns_verify(): www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== ;{id = 64666} m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I know. Thanks, Zbynek From wouter at NLnetLabs.nl Thu Jul 1 15:24:32 2010 From: wouter at NLnetLabs.nl (W.C.A. Wijngaards) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:24:32 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work In-Reply-To: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> References: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Zbynek, Did you compile ldns with --enable-gost? Did openssl compile yourself (gost included by default), or is openssl from the distro (is gost.so installed?)? Best regards, Wouter On 07/01/2010 04:45 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but > unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). > > Here is an input of ldns_verify(): > > www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 > www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 > 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. > ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== > ;{id = 64666} > m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 > vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== > ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} > m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 > BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== > ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} > > ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature > > What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I know. > > Thanks, > Zbynek > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwsszAACgkQkDLqNwOhpPhWggCglnFCfeNSXRr71RSmeo0UEV3C TOUAoKLK68S0/WGz9tOeIrNaTGCHSwtV =SwpL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Thu Jul 1 15:49:15 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:49:15 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work In-Reply-To: <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> References: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <4C2CB8FB.1010308@nic.cz> Hi Wouter, On 1.7.2010 17:24, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Zbynek, > > Did you compile ldns with --enable-gost? Yes. export CFLAGS="-m64 -fPIC" ./configure --enable-gost --with-ssl=../openssl-1.0.0a make > Did openssl compile yourself > (gost included by default), Yes. ./Configure linux-x86_64 shared -fPIC make make test or is openssl from the distro (is gost.so > installed?)? No, I have sources from www.openssl.org. Btw when I used ldns 1.6.3 without GOST and openssl 0.9.8l before, I got: ldns_verify() result: Unknown cryptographic algorithm. So there is some change... :) Regards, Zbynek > Best regards, > Wouter > > On 07/01/2010 04:45 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but >> unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). >> >> Here is an input of ldns_verify(): >> >> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 >> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 >> 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. >> ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== >> ;{id = 64666} >> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 >> vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== >> ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} >> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 >> BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== >> ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} >> >> ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature >> >> What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I know. >> >> Thanks, >> Zbynek >> _______________________________________________ >> ldns-users mailing list >> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkwsszAACgkQkDLqNwOhpPhWggCglnFCfeNSXRr71RSmeo0UEV3C > TOUAoKLK68S0/WGz9tOeIrNaTGCHSwtV > =SwpL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Thu Jul 1 16:01:28 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:01:28 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work In-Reply-To: <4C2CB8FB.1010308@nic.cz> References: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C2CB8FB.1010308@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C2CBBD8.3040908@nic.cz> So the problem is probably in openssl. I use statically compiled libcrypto.a which does not include GOST functions... Zbynek On 1.7.2010 17:49, Zbynek Michl wrote: > Hi Wouter, > > On 1.7.2010 17:24, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Zbynek, >> >> Did you compile ldns with --enable-gost? > > Yes. > > export CFLAGS="-m64 -fPIC" > ./configure --enable-gost --with-ssl=../openssl-1.0.0a > make > >> Did openssl compile yourself >> (gost included by default), > > Yes. > > ./Configure linux-x86_64 shared -fPIC > make > make test > > or is openssl from the distro (is gost.so >> installed?)? > > No, I have sources from www.openssl.org. > > > Btw when I used ldns 1.6.3 without GOST and openssl 0.9.8l before, I got: > ldns_verify() result: Unknown cryptographic algorithm. > So there is some change... :) > > Regards, > Zbynek > >> Best regards, >> Wouter >> >> On 07/01/2010 04:45 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but >>> unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). >>> >>> Here is an input of ldns_verify(): >>> >>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 >>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 >>> 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. >>> ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== >>> >>> ;{id = 64666} >>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 >>> vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== >>> >>> ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} >>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 >>> BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== >>> >>> ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} >>> >>> ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature >>> >>> What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I >>> know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zbynek >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ldns-users mailing list >>> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >>> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkwsszAACgkQkDLqNwOhpPhWggCglnFCfeNSXRr71RSmeo0UEV3C >> TOUAoKLK68S0/WGz9tOeIrNaTGCHSwtV >> =SwpL >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> ldns-users mailing list >> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Thu Jul 1 17:13:18 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:13:18 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work In-Reply-To: <4C2CBBD8.3040908@nic.cz> References: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C2CB8FB.1010308@nic.cz> <4C2CBBD8.3040908@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C2CCCAE.3040306@nic.cz> Yes, it is! I recompiled openssl with enable-static-engine and validation works now :) Regards, Zbynek On 1.7.2010 18:01, Zbynek Michl wrote: > So the problem is probably in openssl. I use statically compiled > libcrypto.a which does not include GOST functions... > > Zbynek > > On 1.7.2010 17:49, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> Hi Wouter, >> >> On 1.7.2010 17:24, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi Zbynek, >>> >>> Did you compile ldns with --enable-gost? >> >> Yes. >> >> export CFLAGS="-m64 -fPIC" >> ./configure --enable-gost --with-ssl=../openssl-1.0.0a >> make >> >>> Did openssl compile yourself >>> (gost included by default), >> >> Yes. >> >> ./Configure linux-x86_64 shared -fPIC >> make >> make test >> >> or is openssl from the distro (is gost.so >>> installed?)? >> >> No, I have sources from www.openssl.org. >> >> >> Btw when I used ldns 1.6.3 without GOST and openssl 0.9.8l before, I got: >> ldns_verify() result: Unknown cryptographic algorithm. >> So there is some change... :) >> >> Regards, >> Zbynek >> >>> Best regards, >>> Wouter >>> >>> On 07/01/2010 04:45 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but >>>> unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). >>>> >>>> Here is an input of ldns_verify(): >>>> >>>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 >>>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 >>>> 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. >>>> ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== >>>> >>>> >>>> ;{id = 64666} >>>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 >>>> vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== >>>> >>>> >>>> ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} >>>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 >>>> BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== >>>> >>>> >>>> ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} >>>> >>>> ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature >>>> >>>> What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I >>>> know. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Zbynek >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ldns-users mailing list >>>> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >>>> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAkwsszAACgkQkDLqNwOhpPhWggCglnFCfeNSXRr71RSmeo0UEV3C >>> TOUAoKLK68S0/WGz9tOeIrNaTGCHSwtV >>> =SwpL >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ldns-users mailing list >>> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >>> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users From wouter at NLnetLabs.nl Fri Jul 2 07:15:23 2010 From: wouter at NLnetLabs.nl (W.C.A. Wijngaards) Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:15:23 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] GOST algorithm validation does not work In-Reply-To: <4C2CCCAE.3040306@nic.cz> References: <4C2CAA04.8070802@nic.cz> <4C2CB330.8070607@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C2CB8FB.1010308@nic.cz> <4C2CBBD8.3040908@nic.cz> <4C2CCCAE.3040306@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C2D920B.3020506@nlnetlabs.nl> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Zbynek, Good to hear that you solved it. There is also a bugfix in the svn trunk of ldns that helps with dynamically linked openssl - gost.so. Best regards, Wouter On 07/01/2010 07:13 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: > Yes, it is! I recompiled openssl with enable-static-engine and > validation works now :) > > Regards, > Zbynek > > On 1.7.2010 18:01, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> So the problem is probably in openssl. I use statically compiled >> libcrypto.a which does not include GOST functions... >> >> Zbynek >> >> On 1.7.2010 17:49, Zbynek Michl wrote: >>> Hi Wouter, >>> >>> On 1.7.2010 17:24, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > Hi Zbynek, > > Did you compile ldns with --enable-gost? >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> export CFLAGS="-m64 -fPIC" >>>> ./configure --enable-gost --with-ssl=../openssl-1.0.0a >>>> make >>>> > Did openssl compile yourself > (gost included by default), >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> ./Configure linux-x86_64 shared -fPIC >>>> make >>>> make test >>>> >>>> or is openssl from the distro (is gost.so > installed?)? >>>> >>>> No, I have sources from www.openssl.org. >>>> >>>> >>>> Btw when I used ldns 1.6.3 without GOST and openssl 0.9.8l before, I >>>> got: >>>> ldns_verify() result: Unknown cryptographic algorithm. >>>> So there is some change... :) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Zbynek >>>> > Best regards, > Wouter > > On 07/01/2010 04:45 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to validate signed domain name using GOST algorithm, but >>>>>> unsuccessfully (ldns r3283, openssl 1.0.0a). >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is an input of ldns_verify(): >>>>>> >>>>>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN A 69.64.81.2 >>>>>> www.m-system.net. 76874 IN RRSIG A 12 3 86400 20100723062450 >>>>>> 20100623062450 64666 m-system.net. >>>>>> ZKhex8zNMVcLnHFHt31y5cOlngVWBHTH5AxhCK2VPK3Jz6RrvFK21F9thuMErAyIIFj0GLadJpNTEAuSkwzubA== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ;{id = 64666} >>>>>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 256 3 12 >>>>>> vvJWsxH3J5IZ6YEcG1C+MaYGX/YwzIeFoIXgUOuGHx/fvet0SJefkPE0il40Sm4T4y5aYN8vyZLQgtJYiCYIbQ== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ;{id = 64666 (zsk), size = 512b} >>>>>> m-system.net. 76874 IN DNSKEY 257 3 12 >>>>>> BDtDa2UxLe7cdDs9bX/X1Y/UXuhJnDrGDRuVQW0BBo8QF1Pr959WBI5QylNxyKp9Rm4yslb1hj4BQUEUWpOLWw== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ;{id = 27152 (ksk), size = 512b} >>>>>> >>>>>> ldns_verify() result: Bogus DNSSEC signature >>>>>> >>>>>> What could be wrong? Domain name signature should be OK as far as I >>>>>> know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Zbynek >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ldns-users mailing list >>>>>> ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl >>>>>> http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users > _______________________________________________ ldns-users mailing list ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwtkgsACgkQkDLqNwOhpPg/0gCgs7l/DRzodtNJD/fyivPi8oP2 AqgAn0M/lAMFYsDDGyytWNy3LMO6eus4 =8sod -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Fri Jul 9 09:45:44 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:45:44 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] ldns_resolver_new_frm_fp_l() comment lines bug In-Reply-To: <4BA2495B.7090507@nlnetlabs.nl> References: <4BA22D0F.5090107@nic.cz> <4BA2495B.7090507@nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <4C36EFC8.5000604@nic.cz> Hi Wouter, if I have in my resolv.conf: #nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 172.20.20.40 -> reads no resolver (error) So at least this bug still persists in r3283. Regards, Zbynek On 18.3.2010 16:40, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Zbynek, > > Fixed in svn r 3210 > > The example you gave did not fail for me? It failed with different > whitespace. But anyway, the comment handling did not properly handle > skipping onto the next line, so I fixed that :-) > > Thanks for the report! > Wouter > > On 03/18/2010 02:39 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> there is probably a bug in ldns_resolver_new_frm_fp_l() function. When I >> use ldns_resolver_new_frm_file() to read /etc/resolv.conf, it >> incorrectly handles comment lines. >> >> So it seems if some line is commented out, then the next line is ommited >> too. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkuiSVsACgkQkDLqNwOhpPiHrgCeKKQ1fV5Oa3m2JC1XCEiSGJmW > r0IAnAxa2XF4C5PUzj76+qdK3v22Y746 > =xDkF > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Fri Jul 9 09:50:23 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:50:23 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] Typo mistake in ldns design documentation In-Reply-To: <4BA21D68.3030007@nlnetlabs.nl> References: <4BA21BF9.8060506@nic.cz> <4BA21D68.3030007@nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <4C36F0DF.5010808@nic.cz> Hi Wouter, there is still uint16_t on the web... Zbynek On 18.3.2010 13:32, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Zbynek, > > Thanks! Fixed in source repository. > > Best regards, > Wouter > > > On 03/18/2010 01:26 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> I have found a little typo mistake in ldns doc at >> "http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/ldns/doc/design.html". >> >> In paragraph "A DNS Resource record looks like this:" TTL should be >> uint32_t type instead of uint16_t as is written. >> >> Regards, >> Zbynek > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkuiHWgACgkQkDLqNwOhpPjr6QCgp03zxWQzcHEnwmaIJjonDil5 > c94AnjEbztSk+jhwZck9CdoQdS/oDLV4 > =fW2U > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users From wouter at NLnetLabs.nl Fri Jul 9 11:24:25 2010 From: wouter at NLnetLabs.nl (W.C.A. Wijngaards) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:24:25 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] ldns_resolver_new_frm_fp_l() comment lines bug In-Reply-To: <4C36EFC8.5000604@nic.cz> References: <4BA22D0F.5090107@nic.cz> <4BA2495B.7090507@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C36EFC8.5000604@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C3706E9.8030102@nlnetlabs.nl> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Zbynek, Fix in r 3191 ... Best regards, Wouter On 07/09/2010 11:45 AM, Zbynek Michl wrote: > Hi Wouter, > > if I have in my resolv.conf: > > #nameserver 127.0.0.1 > nameserver 172.20.20.40 > > -> reads no resolver (error) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkw3BugACgkQkDLqNwOhpPgxlQCfduJqh4rBnRA6KIInI4vVvod+ u+IAnAzab5obvQca0klyOTlsDJtiUZfY =SP/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl Tue Jul 13 08:07:17 2010 From: matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl (Matthijs Mekking) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:07:17 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] Typo mistake in ldns design documentation In-Reply-To: <4C36F0DF.5010808@nic.cz> References: <4BA21BF9.8060506@nic.cz> <4BA21D68.3030007@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C36F0DF.5010808@nic.cz> Message-ID: <4C3C1EB5.2060600@nlnetlabs.nl> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Zbynek, I have updated the website documentation to version 1.6.5, so it is now fixed on the web too. Best regards, Matthijs On 07/09/2010 11:50 AM, Zbynek Michl wrote: > Hi Wouter, > > there is still uint16_t on the web... > > Zbynek > > On 18.3.2010 13:32, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > Hi Zbynek, > > Thanks! Fixed in source repository. > > Best regards, > Wouter > > > On 03/18/2010 01:26 PM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >>>> I have found a little typo mistake in ldns doc at >>>> "http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/ldns/doc/design.html". >>>> >>>> In paragraph "A DNS Resource record looks like this:" TTL should be >>>> uint32_t type instead of uint16_t as is written. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Zbynek _______________________________________________ ldns-users mailing list ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMPB61AAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5bwIIAKHHYijnjZxtJQPimmkpmH+d zNcLmzxGQYACYPyEMWIrc2wRH+K6nZld86YGIbwZbGhn9XgpfLiCfUYpyoq8BYc9 Vw4Jcs6RlAzOVQmOZ2DJzPt/jtZuX1mdbukx2xMIRnkIPmz0XaAacPN2pY17qGFi +A/EoT0TMBmcplmfK39sjHe0vceeicQS2Qlq1VxHRN35GBoJxW+5BLJjgHI0lWJv E+nNftzP2Et0PY8cSPmL9dSEuNi/SwpgnKalHMfejw2pqY9p1iolFqsdSvpmUvbO RLr9iiTDho7PgCcWujrZqcsTgPzkYz3ldgjckv8Oi8PeKiSQF23D+ONeIckNCuY= =4/M8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From zbynek.michl at nic.cz Tue Jul 27 12:19:51 2010 From: zbynek.michl at nic.cz (Zbynek Michl) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:19:51 +0200 Subject: [ldns-users] ldns_resolver_new_frm_fp_l() comment lines bug In-Reply-To: <4C3706E9.8030102@nlnetlabs.nl> References: <4BA22D0F.5090107@nic.cz> <4BA2495B.7090507@nlnetlabs.nl> <4C36EFC8.5000604@nic.cz> <4C3706E9.8030102@nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <4C4ECEE7.2090802@nic.cz> s/3191/3291/ Thanks for the fix, Zbynek On 9.7.2010 13:24, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Zbynek, > > Fix in r 3191 ... > > Best regards, > Wouter > > On 07/09/2010 11:45 AM, Zbynek Michl wrote: >> Hi Wouter, >> >> if I have in my resolv.conf: >> >> #nameserver 127.0.0.1 >> nameserver 172.20.20.40 >> >> -> reads no resolver (error) >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkw3BugACgkQkDLqNwOhpPgxlQCfduJqh4rBnRA6KIInI4vVvod+ > u+IAnAzab5obvQca0klyOTlsDJtiUZfY > =SP/K > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ldns-users mailing list > ldns-users at open.nlnetlabs.nl > http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/ldns-users