[Dnssec-trigger] Reducing dnssec-trigger-script in favor of riggerd

[Martin Sehnoutka]

Hi,

I tried to modify autotools in a way that without the newly introduced
switch there will be no difference. In other words, it should be fully
optional.

Please contact me if you have any further questions.

Best regards,
Martin Sehnoutka

On 05/14/2018 09:50 AM, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> It was held for moderation because it was too large.  I did not see
> that, because I am not the owner of the list, but I have access and
> moderated (a long list of spam held for moderation, and I found your
> email in it, and approved it).
> 
> In general I like contributions that improve the software, if it doesn't
> cause additional complication (eg. some people's wish to move to
> automake that removes support for a bunch of features was denied for
> such reasons).
> 
> Best regards, Wouter
> 
> On 11/05/18 09:06, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I sent those patches some time ago, but the mailing list responded, that
>> the message is waiting for moderation. Any news on that?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
>>
>> On 04/10/2018 09:54 AM, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> On 10/04/18 09:40, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am working on a project of migrating the functionality currently
>>>> provided by the script into the daemon. The build system was modified in
>>>> a way, that you can select which implementation you want during build
>>>> time. It, of course, defaults to the Python implementation. I have also
>>>> added support for simple unit testing and automatic RPM package build on
>>>> push event. Regarding the code base, the "update" command from the
>>>> script is available in the daemon as "update_all", so that they can live
>>>> side by side:
>>>> https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnssec-trigger/blob/master-fedora/riggerd/svr.c#L806
>>>>
>>>> Now, I would like to ask you, is it acceptable for you to receive this
>>>> project as a series of patches over the mailing-list? I know there was a
>>>
>>> Sure just send the patches.  Sounds like it could be a nice improvement!
>>>
>>>> question about migration to Git some time ago, is it being considered?
>>>
>>> The repo is replicated to github by script, I believe.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Wouter
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dnssec-trigger mailing list
>>> dnssec-trigger at NLnetLabs.nl
>>> https://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dnssec-trigger
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssec-trigger mailing list
>> dnssec-trigger at NLnetLabs.nl
>> https://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dnssec-trigger
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dnssec-trigger mailing list
> dnssec-trigger at NLnetLabs.nl
> https://open.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dnssec-trigger
> 

-- 
Martin Sehnoutka | Associate Software Engineer
PGP: 5FD64AF5
UTC+1 (CET)
RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/dnssec-trigger/attachments/20180514/e467c215/attachment.bin>