[Dnssec-trigger] Reducing dnssec-trigger-script in favor of riggerd

W.C.A. Wijngaards wouter at nlnetlabs.nl
Tue Apr 10 07:54:20 UTC 2018

Hi Martin,

On 10/04/18 09:40, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on a project of migrating the functionality currently
> provided by the script into the daemon. The build system was modified in
> a way, that you can select which implementation you want during build
> time. It, of course, defaults to the Python implementation. I have also
> added support for simple unit testing and automatic RPM package build on
> push event. Regarding the code base, the "update" command from the
> script is available in the daemon as "update_all", so that they can live
> side by side:
> https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnssec-trigger/blob/master-fedora/riggerd/svr.c#L806
> Now, I would like to ask you, is it acceptable for you to receive this
> project as a series of patches over the mailing-list? I know there was a

Sure just send the patches.  Sounds like it could be a nice improvement!

> question about migration to Git some time ago, is it being considered?

The repo is replicated to github by script, I believe.

Best regards, Wouter

> Best regards,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/dnssec-trigger/attachments/20180410/cd4be709/attachment.bin>

More information about the dnssec-trigger mailing list