<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 02/11/2012 07:41 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_4F36B676_6020700_ogud_com"
cite="mid:4F36B676.6020700@ogud.com" type="cite">Given that the
load-balancer in question in non DNS compliant why do extra work
to work around the brokeness.
<br>
If enough resolvers say broken the load-balancer will get fixed.
<br>
<br>
Olafur (who has been arguing this now for 10 years, and we
still have broken load balancers because resolvers are too
accomodating)
<br>
</blockquote>
If everybody -or the majority- does this, yes, the load balancer
will be fixed. But in this case everybody could resolve
m.facebook.com, including google, opendns and others. Unbound
couldn't.<br>
Who's the incompetent? - asks the customer...<br>
And unbound will resolve m.facebook.com. Or unbound will be changed
to bind/google/opendns/you name it, because they work in real world
scenarios.<br>
<br>
Of course you are right, but the world works the opposite way. :(<br>
</body>
</html>